Digital Humanities & MacEwan Libraries: an Update

Some time ago, Valla McLean at MacEwan Libraries posted a new & updated page devoted to the work being done in the Digital Humanities here at MacEwan. If you click on the link, you’ll find a list of ongoing projects covering both research and pedagogy, with a special focus on the disciplines of Classics, English, and History.

The site also features some deeper dives into specific examples of pedagogy informed by the Digital Humanities, ranging from podcasting and app-creation to mapping, timelines, and quantitative textual analysis. I was fortunate enough to get the chance to contribute a couple of pieces to Valla’s page, including one on Villanova’s app-version of Augustine’s Confessions and another on how best to go about quantitatively measuring student feedback regarding assignments designed in light of Digital Humanities pedagogy.   

One More Madrid Conference Photo

Image

This is just a quick update to post a photo I received recently from Valentino Gasparini, one of the organizers of last week’s successful conference on Lived Ancient Religion in North Africa, held at Madrid’s Universidad Carlos III. After sharing our talks on the life & afterlife of Augustine of Hippo, we four intrepid presenters fielded a series of thoughtful questions from the audience. A productive exchange was then enjoyed by all.

A Successful Conference in Madrid

I’m happy to report that last week’s Lived Ancient Religion in North Africa conference went off without a hitch. Hosted by the Universidad Carlos III in Madrid and organized by Valentino Gasparini & Maria Fernandez Portaencasa,  the event gathered archaeologists alongside historians of both the material & textual records in order to better understand ‘religion’ as lived praxis in Roman Africa, Numidia, & Mauretania. Here’s a link to LARNA’s FB page, from which the above image was taken.

My paper, “Optatus of Milevis & the Improvisation of Universalism,” sought to read Optatus’ anti-Donatist writings as an example of lived religion and improvisatory praxis in late antiquity. While Augustine of Hippo is usually (& not wrongly) regarded as the theorist of Christian universalism against the Donatists, Optatus pre-dates Augustine as a universalizing force in North Africa. Unlike Augustine, however, Optatus does not begin with theory & end with praxis; instead, he begins with the practical situation & arrives at his universalist commitments on that concrete basis, thereby more effectively speaking universalism into existence for his audience.

Eventually, the conference proceedings will be coming out with Brill. The next task for me, then, is to turn this 20-minute talk into a more substantive chapter, perhaps by elaborating on the methodology of “lived religion” as articulated by Jörg Rüpke in light of the work of Michel de Certeau.

New Article on the ‘Specious Present’ in William James & Augustine

To my pleasant surprise, I was just informed that my piece on the ‘specious present’ in William James & Augustine has already been published in the journal Consensus (40.2). Check it out here! (But beware Brentano in the margins…)

This is the end-result of my research efforts this summer in support of the 2019 Cheiron conference on the history of psychology & the behavioural sciences, which was hosted here at MacEwan University in Edmonton. Thanks go out again to Nancy Digdon, Michael Dawson, & the rest of the Cheiron team. It was great to get out of my Augustinian comfort zone, if only for a little while.

There are a number of other cool pieces in this edition of Consensus, as well. Check out the full table of contents here.

 

Book Available for Pre-Order!

I’m happy to announce that my entry in Bloomsbury’s Reading Augustine series is now available for pre-order! Its title is On Time, Change, History, & Conversion.

Media of On Time, Change, History, and Conversion

My goal in this book is to provide a reader-friendly entry into the complexities of Augustine of Hippo’s philosophy of time. In line with the spirit of the Bloomsbury series, I’ve aimed to put Augustine into conversation with modern realist theories about time, twentieth-century debates in the physics of space-time, & twenty-first-century attitudes about “progress.” As a result, there should be something for just about everyone in there somewhere.

Here are some screenshots of the Table of Contents, just to provide a better idea of what’s in store:

Aarhus & Oxford Talks

This past August, I delivered research talks at Oxford University and the University of Aarhus in Denmark. The first was entitled “The Enforcement of Violence & the Force of Love in Augustine: Epistle 93 & its Aftermath,” while the second was called “Love as a Violent Force in Augustine & Hannah Arendt.”

The papers were spiritual siblings: the first explained the short-term effects of Augustine of Hippo’s fifth-century call for coercive force to be used in the maintenance of community among North African Christians, using maternal love as a model. The second then linked Augustine’s views up with modern debates in political theory about the proper relationship between the use of coercive force and the rhetoric of love.

Special thanks go out to the organizers of Oxford’s International Conference on Patristic Studies & especially Anthony Dupont (KU Leuven) for running the colloquium on “Emotions & Rhetoric in Augustine.” At Aarhus, I’m indebted to Miriam DeCock & Jakob Engberg of the Centre for the Study of Ancient Christianity. I’m hoping to get back to Denmark soon and am cautiously optimistic that a brief version of the argument I debuted in these papers will be included in a future edition of Studia Patristica.

Cheiron 2019: a Success!

I’m going to go ahead & call the Cheiron 2019 conference at MacEwan University a success. Even as an outsider to the history of psychology & the behavioural sciences, I was welcomed in a spirit of collegiality. My paper on the ‘specious present’ in Augustine & William James, meanwhile, received a good deal of constructive feedback, which should allow me to keep working the piece up to a higher level of historical & argumentative precision. Thanks, again, to the Cheiron community!

New Presentation: Augustine of Hippo & William James on the Specious Present

I’m happy to report I’ll be presenting at the 2019 Cheiron Conference on the History of the Behavioural & Social Sciences. This time, my topic will be the debate about the “specious present” in Augustine of Hippo & William James.

While that might sound like an anachronistic comparison, the ancient African Christian and the modern American psychologist actually tend to ask quite similar sorts of questions. In this case, the parallel lies in the present. Both thinkers asked themselves: is there such a thing as a “present moment?”

Augustine answered in the negative. James mostly answered in the positive, though he admitted that ‘in reality’ the present probably did not exist. And yet he cautioned that the psychologist must presume a present, insofar as the scientific psychologist relies upon the notion of a ‘present state of consciousness’ in order to make a judgment, offer a diagnosis, and so on.

The goal of my paper, then, will be both to highlight this distinction between Augustine & James and to explore some consequences of this distinction. We could, for example, ask: might there be any psychological consequences if we presume from the beginning, not that we occupy a specious present, but rather that there is no present at all? And if so, can we continue to speak intelligibly of spontaneity, a moment of decision, an instant of change, or perhaps even a ‘present mental state?’

 

New Presentation: _The Killing Spirit_ @ Canada’s Humanities Congress

At long last, I’ve just registered to present at the Canadian Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences for the first time. I’ll be presenting my research before the Canadian Society of Patristic Studies.

The title of my paper will be “The Killing Spirit: Augustine’s Anti-Manichaean Reception fo the Apocryphal Act of Peter.” It’ll consist of my reading of Augustine’s strange use of that particular apocryphal text in his Contra Adimantium, a little-studied tome that aims to undermine the claims of the Manichaean polemicist Adimantius.

In this fragmentary apocryphon, Peter adopts a controversial stance regarding the status of his own child, who appears to become a pawn in the game of the divine’s demonstration of its own power. In the polemical context of the Contra Adimantium, however, this Act becomes a point of contention in view of the Manichaeans’ rejection of certain “scriptural” texts in favour of others, despite their liminal status within the canonical debates of late antiquity.

 

Forthcoming Article: “Nineveh Overturned: Augustine & Chrysostom on the Threat of Jonah”

Cora Timken Burnett Collection of Persian Miniatures and Other Persian Art Objects, Bequest of Cora Timken Burnett, 1956 (Met Museum; Creative Commons)

Sometime in 2019 or (more likely) 2020, the Journal of Early Christian Studies will publish my article “Nineveh Overturned: Augustine & Chrysostom on the threat of Jonah.” This was a tough piece to write, since I had to dig much deeper than I had previously into the Greek exegetical tradition concerning Jonah. This research began as part of an initiative launched by the Oriental Institute at the University of Chicago, which led to a panel at the Society of Biblical Literature some years back. The final version of my argument, having been tested by some really thoughtful feedback from the journal’s reviewers, should be much stronger than those tentative first steps at SBL.

Here’s the abstract:

Both John Chrysostom and Augustine of Hippo find in the story of Jonah and the Ninevites an invitation to reflect upon the moral and political challenges undergone by cities facing the possibility of disaster. While Nineveh was threatened with destruction at the hands of the divine, cities like Constantinople and Rome were instead threatened with disaster of a natural or military kind, ranging from earthquakes to invasions. Regardless, both Chrysostom and Augustine thought the lessons of Jonah could be applied to contemporary crises. The two pastoral preachers did so in quite different ways, however. For Chrysostom, the repentance of the Ninevites in the face of a divine threat served as a model for his own congregation. For Augustine, however, the divine was incapable of uttering threats, and so Jonah’s prophecy had to come true: Nineveh had to be overturned. In order to make this case, Augustine reconfigured the meaning of the word “overturning” (euersio), so that he could make the case that the repentance of the Ninevites was driven not by their fear, but rather by the combined agency of divine grace and political coercion.